Alexander González
ef8f1f108b
docs: dedup repeated sentence
2023-07-21 14:42:19 +02:00
Joshua Carlson
287172698a
added if3 based on: Using if in a let Statement
2023-07-03 14:52:13 -04:00
Anish
eacf7db6f3
refactor: Update comment to use correct construct name 'Result' instead of 'Option'
...
Refactor the comment in the code to provide a more accurate description of the construct being used. Replace the mention of Option with Result.
2023-06-23 17:18:17 +05:45
liv
b44472b237
Merge branch 'main' into comment_cleanup
2023-06-12 12:39:02 +02:00
liv
171d20ce3e
Merge pull request #1546 from b-apperlo/b-apperlo-patch-1
...
feat: added test function to hashmaps2.rs
2023-06-12 12:20:36 +02:00
liv
974717ca11
Merge pull request #1547 from b-apperlo/b-apperlo-patch-2
...
fix: update hashmaps3.rs
2023-06-12 12:18:36 +02:00
liv
0d2a1bdef1
Merge pull request #1549 from IVIURRAY/enums3-message-test
...
fix(enums3): add test for message
2023-06-12 12:17:07 +02:00
liv
369ae2e63d
feat(move_semantics2): rewrite hint
2023-06-12 12:07:18 +02:00
IVIURARY
d0a1783083
fix(enums3): add test for message
...
closes #1548
2023-06-08 22:14:25 +01:00
Bert Apperlo
a4fe3602b2
fix: updated comment for struct
2023-06-08 16:46:45 +02:00
Bert Apperlo
8974e33f69
fix: update hashmaps3.rs
2023-06-08 16:44:39 +02:00
Bert Apperlo
bbfb4c7e63
feat: added test function to hashmaps2.rs
...
The existing test functions only check if a kind of fruit exists in the hashmap, but not if the amount of fruits is higher than zero. This new test function solves this.
2023-06-08 15:49:07 +02:00
Robert Fry
7eef5d15ee
docs: cleanup the explanation paragraphs at the start of each exercise.
2023-05-29 18:41:51 +01:00
lazywalker
9604ab6621
fix(exercises): use snake_case variables
2023-05-23 15:00:55 +08:00
liv
656140d9e6
Merge pull request #1478 from Ben2917/improved_tests_for_iterators5
...
fix: Added some extra tests to validate iterators5 solution
2023-05-17 16:14:29 +02:00
liv
a6f99645c6
chore: rustfmt
2023-05-17 16:02:39 +02:00
liv
81cd97902a
Merge pull request #1487 from lionel-rowe/patch-1
...
feat(options2): better test for layered_option
2023-05-17 15:56:55 +02:00
Noah May
3ecb47ff2c
fix(options3): panic when not matching to avoid false positives
...
Closes #1503
2023-05-09 15:13:18 -05:00
Aaron Wang
d3fea5f15a
Merge branch 'main' into patch-2
2023-05-01 19:10:56 -04:00
PiqqiDesigns
c4627e7112
chore: clarified cow owned_no_mutation comments
2023-04-27 15:49:40 -07:00
lionel-rowe
836134202e
feat(options2): better tests for layered_option
...
The existing test can be solved with the following:
```rs
while let Some(integer) = optional_integers.pop() {
assert_eq!(integer.unwrap(), range);
```
Similarly with `expect(...)`, `unwrap_or(0)`, `unwrap_or_default()`, etc. However, none of these solutions use the learning point of stacking `Option<T>`s.
The updated test can _only_ be solved by stacking `Option<T>`s:
```rs
while let Some(Some(integer)) = optional_integers.pop() {
assert_eq!(integer, cursor);
```
With the updated test, using `unwrap` or `expect` will panic when it hits the `None` value, and using ` 
